Trending News

Blog Post

Dino Melaye Seek legal protection over election tribunals decision

Dino Melaye Seek legal protection over election tribunals decision 


Senator Dino Melaye, representing Kogi West Senatorial District, has ran to Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal to seek legal protection from the outcome of the Election tribunals sited August 23, 2019 judgement, one which nullified his election as the Senator representing Kogi West at the Senate.

Recall that the candidate of the APC at the said election, Senator Smart Adeyemi, had petitioned the Election Tribunal, challenging the electoral victory of Senator Melaye of the PDP. The Tribunal nullified the election and ordered a fresh poll within 90 days.

But Melaye disagreed with the unanimous decision of the Tribunal and consequently appealed the judgement at the Court of Appeal on 23 grounds where the Tribunal is said to have erred in law.

According to the Notice of Appeal dated September 5, 2019, Senator Melaye, being the appellant also sought two other reliefs which include an order of the Court of Appeal allowing his appeal; and an order sustaining his objection to the petition or dismissing the petition and confirming his electoral victory.

The appeal, which was filed on behalf of the lawmaker by his counsel, the law firm of Rickey Tarfa (SAN), has Senator Smart Adeyemi, All Progressives Congress (APC), People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) as respondents.

Some of the grounds of appeal include whether the person sued at the Tribunal being Senator Dino Melaye is the same as the person who contested the poll and declared the winner of the election as contained in Form CF001 – Melaye Daniel Dino.

“The provision of the law is that the name as used in Form CF001 is the only valid name that can be used to challenge the election of the Appellant.

“The principle of equity accepted and applied by the majority members of the Tribunal cannot override the provisions of the law in respect of the petition.

“The judgement of the Tribunal was perverse and against the weight of evidence before it,” the Notice of Appeal said among several other issues of law raised.


Related posts

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *